<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BetaBuzz Roundup 01</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skyrocket.be/2005/12/05/betabuzz-roundup-01/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skyrocket.be/2005/12/05/betabuzz-roundup-01/</link>
	<description>Chris Ramakers over webdesign, webdevelopment en webtrends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 13:30:44 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.skyrocket.be/2005/12/05/betabuzz-roundup-01/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.skyrocket.be/?p=15#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Well thought out. I think your right most people wont give the time of day to rating results after the fact. Then there are people who use wikipedia, and have lots of time on their hands and think that they will be able to change the results. The thing about Wink is their algorithm. I&#039;m not sure how exactly they are placing there results, but the user results are not very acurate yet at all. Try a search for &quot;taxi&quot;. As the founder of Seekum.com this subject interests me. I have noticed that our users have mostly been deranking sites by what we call &quot;deseekuming them&quot; or pressing the minus button to say it&#039;s not relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well thought out. I think your right most people wont give the time of day to rating results after the fact. Then there are people who use wikipedia, and have lots of time on their hands and think that they will be able to change the results. The thing about Wink is their algorithm. I&#8217;m not sure how exactly they are placing there results, but the user results are not very acurate yet at all. Try a search for &#8220;taxi&#8221;. As the founder of Seekum.com this subject interests me. I have noticed that our users have mostly been deranking sites by what we call &#8220;deseekuming them&#8221; or pressing the minus button to say it&#8217;s not relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

